Ars Technica points out that Viacom is going to have a real problem to overcome should Viacom v. Google ever go to trial: Viacom's own video site, iFilm, contains quite a few clips to which Viacom does not possess the rights, and Viacom itself engages in none of the policing activities that it is suing Google over. If Viacom is unwilling to police its own site, why should a judge penalize Google for not policing YouTube?
Posted by ryan at March 20, 2007 12:57 PM | TrackBack