September 26, 2006

Actually, yeah, it is probably legal

I just finished talking with my law prof about the Wal-Mart situation. He pointed out that unless Wal-Mart is acting in concert with other buyers of DVDs, the unilateral actions of a single merchant are not actionable unless one can show that they are done with the intent to monopolize. As Wal-Mart is far from a monopoly in DVD sales, their actions probably do not fall under anti-competition statutes.

Blockbuster, Netflix, etc. may benefit from Wal-Mart's actions, but unless they work with Wal-Mart to try and keep Apple out of the market, there is no foul.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • YahooMyWeb
  • co.mments
  • Ma.gnolia
  • De.lirio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlinkList
  • NewsVine
  • scuttle
  • Fark
  • Shadows
Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!
Posted by ryan at September 26, 2006 11:48 AM | TrackBack
Comments
Post a comment









Remember personal info?