The reaction to this whole "Equality Ride" thing is really mystifying to me. I mean, we're talking about a group that wants to change the church's opinions on sexual ethics by targeting Christian colleges with a juvenile PR stunt.
Let's say a group supporting the wonders of pre-marital sex wanted to do the same thing, and framed their discussion in terms of "discussion," "dialog," and "compassion." And they said they'd be on campus whether Covenant permitted them to or not. What about a group calling for church recognition of the validity of divorce? I mean, heck, these are both commonly recognized familial decisions in today's culture, why shouldn't we give them a "fair hearing" as well? What if the group was an abortion rights group? Do we let them trespass with impunity?
Hell, what if they were a group of traveling salesmen wanting to sell male hygiene products? Do they get a free pass? How about Scientologists? I mean, seriously, they just want to have an open, honest discussion with the student body. Why not?
Thing is, if we don't take a stand on this trespassing group, there is no logical reason not to let any of these other groups on campus too. Don't be fooled by their rhetoric.
Posted by ryan at February 9, 2007 9:03 AM | TrackBackI agree with what you are saying.
Posted by: Anon at February 9, 2007 9:23 AMRyan, i read your blog regligiously, and always appreciate your perspective.
That being said, i think that this may not be a case for legal thinking. That is, the soulforce folks' whole stunt is based on the hope that we will react in an inflammatory way (calling the cops, kicking them out, vandalizing their bus, etc, etc). That's why it makes such a good publicity stunt.
I think it is juvenile and disrespectful that they did not accept the college's good-faith invitation to visit with a schedule of activities; and i think it is on this point that the college should take the moral high ground.
I would love to see Neil B. Neilson stand up with a microphone in front of soulforce and the student body, and warmly welcome them and talk about how covenant always welcomes and open dialogue, etc, etc, and then . . . openly chastise them for the lack of respect in working with the institution to accomodate them.
I think it's helpful to find some sort of common denominator. And since the teachings of the bible are obviously not embraced by both parties, I think covenant should appeal to the left's mantra of "cooperation" and "respect" and flaunt in their faces how pathetically inconsistent they are soulfource's behavior. Neil should also mention that Martin Luther King and leaders of the civil right's movement never enjoyed the benefits of such hospitality from conservative institutions, and he would've been more respectful.
Posted by: isaac at February 9, 2007 11:08 AMIsaac: as a matter of tactics, I find myself reluctantly in agreement. That would seem to be a more effective way of dealing with the problem than seeking a legal remedy, no matter how justified. I have approximately zero patience for this kind of overt stunt, but serious analysis would indicate that your suggestions are perhaps the best way of deflecting as much damage as possible.
I would, however, want to preserve the option of legal remedies should they become appropriate. A certain amount of permissiveness may be unavoidable, but Covenant does remain private property and letting these jokers into the dorms strikes me as a Bad Idea.
Posted by: ryan at February 9, 2007 11:20 AMbottom line is this:
there is nothing wrong with having people of all sorts of political/social/theological perspective over to your house to talk and get to know each other.
That is not what this stunt is. It's just bullying, and you can't give bullies what they want, in this case, inflammatory action. It just fulfills the stereotypes they already have, and gives them something to bitch about at their next cocktail party.
Posted by: isaac at February 9, 2007 11:33 AMHow about we organize our own "SoulForce is Full of Shit" campaign and show up at Covenant and try to engage the group in conversation about their stupid tactics? We'll carry signs that read "Half-Assed Liberalism Not Welcome"
Posted by: davidm. at February 9, 2007 11:37 AMbetter yet: how about if we dress up as the village people and attach ourselves to the soulforce people, insisting that we're with them. We'd hand out fliers and everything.
then we'd see how much open dialogue and tolerance ensued.
Posted by: isaac at February 9, 2007 11:41 AMSoulForce - PWNED.
Posted by: davidm at February 9, 2007 11:42 AMSheer genius! I now endorse this as my official recommendation. Bust out the Madonna and work on that lisp! If they want stereotypes, then damn it, we'll give them stereotypes.
Posted by: ryan at February 9, 2007 11:47 AM